Three Epstein Associates and ex UK Military Intelligence are protecting Free Speech in Canada? Sketchy.

And to top it off the story is being heavily suppressed on X/Twitter

My previous work on this story here:

Free Speech Union names Epstein Associate as Chairman of the Board

With the release of millions of additional files on Jeffrey Epstein it has come to light that Toby Young, the founder of both the UK’s and Canada’s Free Speech Unions, is all caught up in the story.

Given that Toby (Baron Young of Acton) is behind the Free Speech Unions in both the United Kingdom and Canada I thought had better have a closer look into FSU Canada. I had written about FSU’s naming Lawrence Krauss as Chairman of the Board back in November. At the time I didn’t think to check for any other members who might have been so close to Jeffrey Epstein. What were the chances of that? Well more fool me! All along there has been a second sitting on the Advisory Board: Steven Pinker.

That’s 3 out of the 17 founders & board members who had a relationship to Epstein. Toby Young, Lawrence Krauss and Steven Pinker. Gob-smacked. How could this happen!?

I did a quick check on some of the other members before composing this report though a more in-depth dive into their backgrounds is necessary. Even this preliminary look, however, revealed another shocker. Right there in the FSU’s biography of their Communications Team member Gordon Patrick Newell it states that Mr. Newell is former British Military Intelligence! At least they’re open about it, I guess. But what the heck is he doing involving himself in a Canadian ‘grass-roots’ non-profit dedicated to free speech?

I’m left to ask myself what kind of organization this is.

Could the FSU Canada be narrative control through a containment strategy? A way to lure dissident voices and then abandon them when the time is right?

Listen to this short video by Doc Malik wherein he recalls his treatment at the hands of the Free Speech Union UK:

It’s all starting to make sense now, he says, and I agree.

To me, it seems that Doc Malik’s case would have been perfect for the Free Speech Union’s legal team to take up. Instead, they did nothing. Worse than nothing - their dismissal of his experience actually served to further alienate him in his time of need.

Are the people leading and directing the Free Speech Unions fulfilling a bigger agenda, one that they are attempting to hide by advertising themselves as the people’s champions? Is the fact that Doc Malik’s guest spoke out against Israel a clue as to what the real agenda might be?

I’ve been studying online propaganda and Narrative Networks for almost 10 years. I began by looking at the large foundations and their funding of the left-wing media. It wasn’t until the Covid lockdowns that I turned my attention to “right wing.” I used scare quotes just then because a lot of the people involved on the ‘alt-right’ are classically Liberals. (Think Rogan, Peterson, Bari Weiss, The Weinstein brothers, Elon Musk, etc) Some had long histories supporting the US Democrats. Perhaps before 2020 there were two opposing sides, but my work has led me to conclude that as it stands now both sides are working hand in hand to achieve a .. well.. dare I say it? To achieve a New World Order. This new order is technocratic in nature and will benefit the elites of any political stripe to the detriment of the rest of mankind. Finally, the pro-Zionist, Jewish supremacist element is playing a central role as it becomes increasingly evident that the immense resources of Israel and its diaspora are openly determined to control all narratives to their favour.

One final element I must point to is the obvious Big Tech suppression of this story about the Free Speech Union. For their part, the members I’ve contacted regarding the Epstein-connections to their Advisory Boards have not responded. The organization itself has not responded. I’ve been trying to get a reaction from them since November, 2025 but they refuse to acknowledge me.

Aside from that, no matter where, when or how I post the FSU story on X/Twitter it gets almost no interaction. You could argue that it’s just because no one is interested. Fine. It’s impossible for me to prove otherwise. However, consider that a post I made about one un-named CBC reporter appearing in a single 2009 Epstein email asking Epstein to bid in a charity fundraising auction was immediately picked up on and skyrocketed to over 23,000 views in less than 24 hours. Why is that so much more compelling to the X algo? I believe this direct comparison speaks volumes.

The bias is astonishingly clear: negative news about CBC (the Canadian government-funded media organization) is desired and promoted by the Narrative Network. On the other hand a negative story about the ‘grassroots’ Free Speech Union (which centres itself on ‘anti-woke’ political issues) is not. The second story is much more compelling and relevant but it sits there unread because it doesn’t fit with the big plan to undermine the Canadian government in favour of shadowy international power players. I propose to you that that shadowy network includes the Free Speech Union of Canada. You have been warned.

---

The Narrative Network get all kinds of money for doing the dirty work of elites in the background. I rely on reader support only! Can you spare a few bucks? If so, thank you very kindly.

Click the link to be taken to my web site where a donation link is provided: